<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the official domus, inc. blog &#187; 3G</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domusinc.com/blog/tag/3g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domusinc.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:46:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&#8217;s Tenuous Brand Position</title>
		<link>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2010/03/atts-tenuous-brand-position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2010/03/atts-tenuous-brand-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Padovani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand positioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domusinc.com/blog/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what brand position does AT&#038;T still hold? They're the brand with not the fastest nor slowest network that is not the broadest nor spottiest in its coverage. This isn't exactly a powerful position to hold. If I were a stock trader...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">In the world of wireless phone networks, AT&amp;T has spent a lot of money staking out its brand position as the &#8220;fastest 3G network&#8221;, battling Verizon Wireless, who staked out the claim of &#8220;broadest coverage&#8221; (and a previous variation, &#8220;most reliable network&#8221;). AT&amp;T&#8217;s problem, though, is that they did invest enough to maintain the physical reality of their claim.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">First, Verizon marginalized AT&amp;T&#8217;s brand position with their &#8220;they have a map for it&#8221; campaign, visually hammering their spotty coverage. In response, AT&amp;T has tried to regain the word &#8220;fastest&#8221; in people&#8217;s minds with their own huge advertising campaign.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">However, while they&#8217;ve been busy insisting that they&#8217;re the fastest 3G network, Sprint is starting to make that claim as meaningless as a horse-and-buggy manufacturer claiming they have the fastest buggy. Sprint is now rolling out its nationwide 4G network (in partnership with Clearwire), beating both AT&amp;T and Verizon to the punch.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Sprint&#8217;s coverage is still spotty, as it tries to roll out its service in more and more cities, but it&#8217;s already available in almost 30 cities with more promised by the end of the year.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">As such, Verizon&#8217;s brand position has not been damaged much &#8211; as far as they are concerned, Sprint occupies the same competitive position as AT&amp;T &#8211; faster but with spottier coverage, and especially spotty in the high speed arena. On the other hand, AT&amp;T&#8217;s position is significantly damaged. First Verizon made its &#8220;fastest&#8221; claim less significant by pointing out that its 3G availability was limited. And now Sprint has a fast, but spotty network; however, Sprint&#8217;s network is 4G &#8211; much faster than AT&amp;T&#8217;s.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So what brand position does AT&amp;T still hold? They&#8217;re the brand with not the fastest nor slowest network that is not the broadest nor spottiest in its coverage. This isn&#8217;t exactly a powerful position to hold. If I were a stock trader&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Domus is an <a href="http://www.domusinc.com" target="_blank">advertising, public relations, and social media marketing agency</a> based in Philadelphia. For more information, visit us at <a href="http://www.domusinc.com" target="_blank">http://www.domusinc.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2010/03/atts-tenuous-brand-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Round: Cotto (AT&amp;T) vs. Pacquio (Verizon)</title>
		<link>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2009/11/next-round-cotto-att-vs-pacquio-verizon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2009/11/next-round-cotto-att-vs-pacquio-verizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marco Padovani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theres a map for that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domusinc.com/blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no comparison between the two sets of ads. Verizon's "There's a Map for That" ads are so simple, so biting, and so memorable - truly classic. But AT&#038;T's ad (above) just doesn't have any punch. Great marketing works; poor marketing doesn't.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">In our last post, we compared the Verizon / AT&amp;T battle over their wireless networks to the recent Manny Pacquio / Migel Cotto fight, with Verizon playing the role of Pacquio (who demolished Cotto). Well, the bell has rung in the next round and a battered Cotto (AT&amp;T), makes a feeble effort at regaining the upper hand.</p>
<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X3PbBmElObI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">There&#8217;s just no comparison between the two sets of ads. Verizon&#8217;s &#8220;There&#8217;s a Map for That&#8221; ads are so simple, so biting, and so memorable &#8211; truly classic. But AT&amp;T&#8217;s ad (above) just doesn&#8217;t have any punch. Great marketing works; poor marketing doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Domus is a <a title="Domus - advertising, public relations, social media, internet presence management" href="http://www.domusinc.com" target="_blank">full-service advertising, PR, and internet marketing agency</a> based in Philadelphia. For more about us, please visit our web site at <a title="Domus - advertising, public relations, social media, internet presence management" href="http://www.domusinc.com" target="_blank">http://www.domusinc.com.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.domusinc.com/blog/2009/11/next-round-cotto-att-vs-pacquio-verizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

